AI builder Form processing- not predicting required fields

[PreetiShah]

I am trying to build invoice processing, while analyzing my sample forms , it gives me very few fields analyzed( required fileds are not getting identify). Is there any way to define custom fields which are not getting identified by AI builder while it gets train?

[moutinhoabreu]

Thanks. This will be a huge jump in terms of productivity and reliability.

Super 

You guys are great !!!

Keep safe.

[jam2]

@JoeF-MSFT Do you know when the explicit field tagging functionality will be released as we are nearly end of April 2020. Thanks

[JoeF-MSFT]

Hello everybody,

Yesterday we released an update to Form processing where you can now draw fields that were not automatically detected by AI Builder. If you had tried Form processing before and you were not able to extract all the fields you wanted, I invite you to give it a try now.

Do not hesitate to share your feedback as you try it out!

More information on our documentation page: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ai-builder/create-form-processing-model

[seetharaman1987]

in every invoice the company name always comes in a logo. or a fancy image or a word art. while the documents comes as PDF , AI builder always fails to identify even if you train properly with same layout. any recommendation for this? @JoeF-MSFT . i even tried to not point out the image but still the in accuracy remains.
for example . in the below screen snip , previously the vendor name was tagged from the image on the middle . later i changed to the second line of  the left hands side information (CGI out door Inc.,) 
surprisingly. still i got the same result as you can see, this snap is from the rest run. but only invoice number and invoice date is detected

[JoeF-MSFT]

Hi @seetharaman1987, thanks for the message and letting us know about this. Just to double check:

• Every invoice that you are tagging within the collection of your Form Processing model has the same layout?
• How many invoice samples did you upload for training? Adding more samples can help improve the model.
• Depending on the fields you need from the invoice, you might be able to also leverage the Invoice Processing prebuilt model that doesn't require training: Invoice processing prebuilt AI model - AI Builder | Microsoft Docs

Let me know. Happy to keep investigating if you are still not getting good results.

[seetharaman1987]

Hi , 

to answer your questions in order , 

1.Yes

2. 5 but as u say i will give more. 

3.i was trying the method suggested by you , but i have some 15-20 fields to be extracted. am not sure how much a pre built model would be very much useful. probably it can extract some obvious details like , invoice number , company name and invoice date. 

to begin with it might be ok. but i need more fields to  complete my POC.

[JoeF-MSFT]

Thanks for the update @seetharaman1987. Let me know if adding more documents for training helps. If not, happy to further investigate with you. 

[seetharaman1987]

i tried tagging different feilds. it helps. but still finding issues in  tracing table content.  and more important;y , is it possible toautomate this process of training itself ?

[JoeF-MSFT]

Hi @seetharaman1987, thank you for the update!

Currently there is no option to automate the training process.

I'm reaching out by private message to discuss in more details your use case. 

[seetharaman1987]

Hi , tried to reach u out in private message.