Hi @Eric_Hu,
I have made a test on my side and please take a try with the following workaround:
variables('J')?['A']
@equals(items('Apply_to_each')?['B'],'1')
items('Apply_to_each')?['C']
Image reference:
The flow works successfully as below:
Best regards,
Kris
Hi @Eric_Hu,
I have made a test on my side and please take a try with the following workaround:
variables('J')?['A']
@equals(items('Apply_to_each')?['B'],'1')
items('Apply_to_each')?['C']
Image reference:
The flow works successfully as below:
Best regards,
Kris
Hi @v-xida-msft
Perfect!!! I can work.
"items('Apply_to_each')?['C']" is I want to know!!!
Thank you very much!!!
Hi @v-xida-msft
I got a similar issue here, do you have any idea to solve it?
My flow scheme share as follows the link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m_zFgFYUxs2JZFoQc27ENnzVZTW0ZZlm/view
The scheme explains:
Send an HTTP request to take the excel file form SharePoint and invoke the excel's data from HTTP, finally retrieve the pure data form "value", this way is good for avoiding the SharePoint's versioning setting of "Require Check out" and don't need to format the excel file to be the table type, also quick and efficiently, but I stuck with the data after invoking from HTTP, please see below photo for the data get from "Value" and names it rows:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t32RDFPeorDH5aChbsMxV0ryGUwnUMts/view
[
Regards,
ilu989
Join digitally, March 2โ4, 2021 to explore new tech that's ready to implement. Experience the keynote in mixed reality through AltspaceVR!
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
57 | |
42 | |
37 | |
33 |
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
73 | |
72 | |
60 | |
40 |