Solved! Go to Solution.
StartsWith is the only workaround we have. If you need SEARCH function capabilities that are not limited by delegation you must change datasource to SQL or the Common Data Service.
Here's a full list of delegable Sharepoint functions.
https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/sharepoint-delegation-improvements/
---
Please click "Accept as Solution" if my post answered your question so that others may find it more quickly. If you found this post helpful consider giving it a "Thumbs Up."
StartsWith is the only workaround we have. If you need SEARCH function capabilities that are not limited by delegation you must change datasource to SQL or the Common Data Service.
Here's a full list of delegable Sharepoint functions.
https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/sharepoint-delegation-improvements/
---
Please click "Accept as Solution" if my post answered your question so that others may find it more quickly. If you found this post helpful consider giving it a "Thumbs Up."
Hi @GrafG ,
@mdevaney is correct that you cannot filter a SharePoint list using "in". However, if you create a collection from your list, you can filter it using "in" and there is theoretically no limit to the number of items in a collection. There are several ways you can overcome the 2k limit on the Collect and ClearCollect functions. One example is /How-can-i-manage-to-filter-more-than-2000-records . All SharePoint lists have an ID column and you can use that to bring in chunks of data that can be added to a single collection.
Stay up tp date on the latest blogs and activities in the community News & Announcements.
Dive into the Power Platform stack with hands-on sessions and labs, virtually delivered to you by experts and community leaders.
User | Count |
---|---|
219 | |
207 | |
85 | |
58 | |
36 |