Hide data cards if multiple checkboxes are unchecked

[swan_soup]

Hi all,

Currently I'm working with an application in which I have a form with additional data cards that show up after a checkbox is ticked. 

For example:

[Employee]                   [Supervisor]              [Manager]

       [x]                                 [ ]                               [x]

[Addtl Employee]                                          [Addtl Manager]

Because of the way the forms are I've had to keep the datacard itself visible and only set a visible variable to the Title and Control within the datacard. This is because if I set the Visible on the datacard it would look like this if the same checkboxes are checked. 

[Employee]                  [Supervisor]                  [Manager]

       [x]                                 [ ]                                [x]

[Addtl Employee]        [Addtl Manager]

My issue now is that whenever all checkboxes are unchecked it leaves a big space in the middle of the form, which isn't the best scenario for the UI of the app we are developing. 

So my question is what would be the best method of going about this?

Is there any specific function I can create that would basically say

If(Checkbox1 is blank & Checkbox2 is blank & Checkbox3 is blank, UpdateContext({ShowAdditional: true}), UpdateContext({ShowAdditional: false}))

Thanks and let me know if more clarity is needed on my end.

[v-xida-msft]

HI @swan_soup ,

Based on the needs that you mentioned, I have made a test on my side, please take a try with the following workaround:

Set the OnSelect property of each Checkbox (Checkbox1, Checkbox2 and Checkbox3) to following:

If(
   Checkbox1.Value = false && Checkbox2.Value = false && Checkbox3.Value = false,
   UpdateContext({ShowAdditional: true}),
   UpdateContext({ShowAdditional: false})
)

Please take a try with above solution, then check if the issue is solved.

Best regards,

[Anonymous]

Hi @swan_soup how are you progressing with this? Was the above reply helpful? 

Thank you,

@Anonymous