MS Flow - Pagination Error from today on all instances

[dxshyam]

@aegt1510 I am using List Records for Common Data Service.

I had 4050 Active Contact records, My flow is supposed to deactivate all Active Contact records.

This time I kept the Pagination OFF and Threshold as 4050 to see if it helps (although in my case the number of records would vary and I can never keep the exact count here)

Observation: The flow processed the default limit of 512 records, so 512 out of 4050 Active Contacts were deactivated in this execution of flow and now I have 3538 Active Contacts.

In my case Turning OFF Pagination did not help

Regards,

Shyam

[Rashkae]

Can confirm turning pagination off for the Excel Connector and setting the threshold to 10k fixed the error

[dxshyam]

Another observation when using List Record connector for Common Data Service is, When the Pagination is OFF, you set some value say 10000 to Threshold and save. it actually does not save that value even though it shows that value in Threshold.

Confirmed this by opening the Flow again and checking the settings for Threshold. The threshold is empty and therefore the flow executes with default limit of 512 records.

Regards,

Shyam

[dbridges101]

I am having the exact same behavior with pagination using CDS List Records action. Worked up until last night for me. 

[frantisekcapek]

I have a temporary solution.



https://www.linkedin.com/posts/franti%C5%A1ek-%C4%8Dapek_ms-flow-pagination-error-from-today-on-acti...

[vecerpa]

Latest info from support is that there has been rolled out fix to all environments. It should be applied till end of today. But not yet confirmed that it works.
Pavel

[dxshyam]

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for sharing the update, is there any URL to check the update on this or have they communicated to you via email.

Thanks,

Shyam

[dxshyam]

Hi @frantisekcapek ,

Thanks for sharing your temp solution. what expression have you used inside Condition2? is it length(List Records)?

Thanks,

Shyam

[dxshyam]

Hi All,

Spoiler

Looks like it is fixed 

Just triggered my flow manually with Pagination ON and Threshold 10000 and processed over 1000 records with List records for Common Data Service connector. After this completes execution, I will do another 3-4 rounds of testing with about 6500 records each. Will post my observation in about 4-5 hours from now.

Thanks,

Shyam

[frantisekcapek]

Hey @dxshyam ,

yes, the expression is length(body('List_records')?['value']).

Best Regards,
Frantisek

[dxshyam]

Spoiler

Resolved: List Records for Common Data Service

I have done 4 rounds of testing in two instances with about 6500 records to process by keeping Pagination ON and Threshold 10000. I can say that this is working fine for me now.

Thank you all for sharing your experience and expertise.

Regards,

Shyam

[dxshyam]

@frantisekcapek Thanks for sharing your work around.

[frantisekcapek]

 dxshyam No problem mate

[v-bacao-msft · Accepted solution]

Hi @dxshyam  & All,

The message I am currently receiving is "The hotfix has been deployed successfully to all the region, and the issue has been Mitigated."

What is the situation on your side? Please check it and if the problem still exists, please let us know.

Best Regards,

[dxshyam]

Hi Barry,

Yes, it is resolved. At about 15:00 hrs IST on 16th November this was resolved for me.

Thank you.

Shyam

[dxshyam]

Hi @v-bacao-msft 

Yes, the issue is resolved. All my instances start working as expected from 15:30 hrs IST of 16th November.

Thank you,

Shyam

[mukie]

Hi v-bacao-msft

Dynamics365 data acquisition
Error control when Dynamics365 data acquisition fails

Forms → Dynamics365 data flow processing
Error control when Forms → Dynamics365 data flow processing fails

I thought it would not fail to list Dynamics365 records
I was creating Flow without entering the scope.

However, based on this matter, the list of Dynamics365 records can also be included in the scope.
I thought I should catch the error.

I would like to tell you which configuration of the execution conditions of the scope that catches anomalies should be set.
Although “failed to” is always checked,
I'm wondering if I should add "I've timed out".