Ownership differences for apps and flows and licensing

[byrnep]

Is the below correct, and would it work the same way if you assigned a mail-enabled security group or O365 group as owner?

Also, assuming that best way to manage ownership is with solution aware, so ownership can be changed post development.

Automated/scheduled flow:

-Owner must have correct licensing as the flow will use the owners licensing or group membership licensing

Instant Flow:

-Owner licensing has no impact.

-User running flow, licensing will be used

Apps:

-Owner licensing is not used

-User running flow, licensing will be used

-Any flows the App calls will use the user licensing

[Pstork1]

Those summaries of licensing are all correct.  In terms of Groups as owners.  That won't really change the licensing because the license requirement will be for the account that is used to create the connection.  Anyone in the group can configure the connection, but it will be a specific user account used by the connection.  That is what determines the license requirement, not the ownership.  Ownership of an app or a flow just determines who can edit the app, flow or connection.

[byrnep]

Ok.  Got it.  Thanks @Pstork1 

Would the above also apply for a single user being the owner?  I'm assuming there is no difference.

[Pstork1 · Accepted solution]

Yes, the same applies if its a single user as the owner.