This effectively kills our PowerApps development. Please work on revising your latest license structure (Oct 2019) to allow us to use the product again.
For us this has gone from an effective enterprise form and app solution to an overpriced nightmare that will impact unsuspecting users who created applications prior to the change.
I don't really understand the licensing model at all. I work for a large organisation and we have built a number of apps and flows that just use SharePoint lists for no additional cost. I assumed that if we paid for a per app licence that would allow us to connect to Dataverse for the specific app and everyone in the organisation would be able to use it. I am being told by out IT team that the reality is that that would actually cost $5 for each of the 12000 users per month. Is that right? No business case will be approved on that basis.
@RobAllen My understanding is that your IT Team are correct. Clearly this is a major barrier to adoption hence the recent 'halving' of the per App license cost (well, $5 for one app rather than $10 for up to two apps).
What the model fails to take into account (well, in addition to the fact that you often have to pay extra to connect two MS Services, both of which you are already paying for, e.g. connecting Power Apps to SQL), is how much the Apps are going to be used (a consumption based model).
You might want an App open to all staff to report 'near misses' which might be used by each staff member a couple of times a year, and a Point-Of-Sales App that is used constantly by just 10% of staff. The former App will cost far more than the latter.
In the cloud world charges should be based on consumption, not on how much value MS think you might be able to get from the Apps that you create. Its a bit like charging a million dollars for Word on the basis that JK Rowling* used it to write a book that made a billion dollars even though most people just want to write the occasional letter.
*Note - I have no idea what word processing package JK Rowling uses.
@PaulD1 : would love PowerApps to be consumption based, but the reality of it is it's not going to be. It's the difference between the SaaS (Office, subscription-based) and PaaS (Azure, consumption-based) models.
I used to be a rather vocal opponents to the licensing switches made two years ago. I felt the pricing was simply out of touch with reality and killing an otherwise great product in the egg. Now I feel we're starting to have real options :
The cherry on the cake would be a "Power Apps on Azure" dedicated capacity along the lines of Power BI Premium, but I'm now pretty happy with how things are.
@FredericForest : Glad you have found a way forward that works for you/your project scenarios.
I'm now starting to work in other technologies that I feel are a better fit for my project requirements and the licensing is a major (but not the only) factor that has pushed me away from Power Apps.
I haven't really experimented with Dataverse for Teams, 'locking' my apps within Teams does not seem a good fit for my projects and my understanding is that you can't even set a unique constraint on a DfT column so in some respects it seems even more limited than a SharePoint list, but maybe I'll give it a try if a suitable project comes along.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.