Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Properly filter SharePoint Yes/No column.

There is a well known "bug" when working with SharePoint list Yes/No column :

The Yes/No value can not be compare to boolean type true/false. 


Filter(SPList,YesNoColumn = true) will not return all the items with a Yes value .


The workaround is to use 1 or 0:

Filter(SPList,YesNoColumn = 1)

This will return all items with a true value, but the designer shows an error because we are comparing a boolean to a number. 


It would be great to fixe that, as a Yes/No column is indeed a boolean value, we need to be able to compare that to a boolean value in PowerApps. 



Status: Planned

Adding @GregLi as an FYI. 

Level: Power Up

So this was logged almost a year ago and still seems to be a bug.

You might also note that 

Filter(source, YesNoColumn=false)

Doesn't return an error, it just doesn't work - the edit form however seems quite happy reading and saving this value as a boolean, so after spending two weeks working on an app, when I get to the screen that requires this filtering functionality - I only see now it doesn't actually work. 
Based on the delegation issues of the workarounds, I now have to go back to my source and rewire my app to use text columns instead - and any piece of code and form that references this column, and my PBI dashboards, AND my flows.

Smiley MadMan MadCat Mad

@Audrie-MSFT  - does a bug have to have a lot of votes to be fixed?

Level: Power Up

This seems to be a bug to me as well. It has said "Planned" since 2017, and it is now August of 2019, with no changes. Any updates on the implementation of this fix from @microsoft?

Level: Powered On

I can't even believe we need to raise this as an 'idea' to improve PowerApps. This is a BUG, and needs to be fixed quickly.


The inconsistency in handling Yes/No fields in PowerApps formulas makes it almost impossible to use those fields. A Filter operation that was working fine with (SharePoint column) 'Active=true', suddenly stopped working when another condition was added to the filter. In fact it started selecting items matching the opposite condition, i.e. 'Active=false'.


Changing it to 'Active=1' gives an incompatible type comparison warning, yet works sometimes. Changing it to 'Active<>0' also works only sometimes, particularly when multiple conditions are combined. And of course it gives a delegation error. All these are serious but basic bugs.


@Audrie-MSFT Is there any sort of ETA for fixing this?

Flow Staff

@TopShelf-MSFT Could you help @rjgeeky with this question? or Redirect to someone who would be able to estimate if a change is planned please?


Thank you for your patience,


Level: Powered On

Yeah, this one seems a beyond silly to STILL be in the backlog.  So, @TopShelf-MSFT can you give an answer on timeline...and take some pressure off @Audrie-MSFT, please?